je la définition suivante pour closed_subspace_equivComment écrire des définitions avec « coq sous-types »
Record Closed_Subspace (V:Normed_Space) := {
closed_subspace :> V -> Prop;
addition_closure : forall (x y:V),(closed_subspace x) -> (closed_subspace y) -> (closed_subspace (add V x y));
smul_closure : forall (x:V) (a:R),(closed_subspace x) -> (closed_subspace (scalar_mul V a x));
subspace_closure : forall (x:V), closure (closed_subspace) x <-> closed_subspace x}.
Definition closed_subspace_equiv {V : Normed_Space} (U:Closed_Subspace V) (x y:V) (p:U x)(q:U y) := exists z:V,(add V x z = y) /\ (U z).
Ce que je voudrais est quelque chose comme
Definition closed_subspace_equiv {V : Normed_Space} (U:Closed_Subspace V) (x y:U) := exists z:U,(add V x z = y).
Comment puis-je faire cela?
Pour le contexte, voici Normed_Space.
Record Normed_Space : Type := mknormspace
{Vspace :> Type;
add : Vspace -> Vspace -> Vspace;
neg : Vspace -> Vspace;
scalar_mul : R -> Vspace -> Vspace;
zero : Vspace;
norm : Vspace -> R;
add_assoc : forall x y z:Vspace, add x (add y z) = add (add x y) z;
add_comm : forall x y:Vspace, add x y = add y x;
add_inv : forall x:Vspace, add x (neg x) = zero;
add_id : forall x:Vspace, add x zero = x;
mul_assoc : forall (x:Vspace) (a b:R), scalar_mul a (scalar_mul b x) = scalar_mul (a*b) x;
mul_id : forall x:Vspace, scalar_mul 1 x = x;
mul_dist1 : forall (x:Vspace) (a b:R), scalar_mul (a+b) x = add (scalar_mul a x) (scalar_mul b x);
mul_dist2 : forall (x y:Vspace) (a:R), scalar_mul a (add x y) = add (scalar_mul a x) (scalar_mul a y);
norm_pos : forall x:Vspace, (x=zero) \/ (norm x > 0);
norm_multi : forall (x:Vspace) (a:R), norm (scalar_mul a x) = (Rabs a)*(norm x)}.
Le code ne compilera pas - la définition de 'closure' est manquante. –