En fait, j'essayais d'obtenir des données de la base de données elgg en fonction de plusieurs jointures. Il a généré une très grosse requête avec beaucoup d'instructions JOIN et la requête ne répond jamais.Y a-t-il une limite à "join" ou "where" ou longueur de requête SQL?
SELECT distinct e.* from test_entities e
JOIN test_metadata m1 on e.guid = m1.entity_guid
JOIN test_metastrings ms1 on ms1.id = m1.name_id
JOIN test_metastrings mv1 on mv1.id = m1.value_id
JOIN test_objects_entity obj on e.guid = obj.guid
JOIN test_metadata m2 on e.guid = m2.entity_guid
JOIN test_metastrings ms2 on ms2.id = m2.name_id
JOIN test_metastrings mv2 on mv2.id = m2.value_id
JOIN test_metadata m3 on e.guid = m3.entity_guid
JOIN test_metastrings ms3 on ms3.id = m3.name_id
JOIN test_metastrings mv3 on mv3.id = m3.value_id
JOIN test_metadata m4 on e.guid = m4.entity_guid
JOIN test_metastrings ms4 on ms4.id = m4.name_id
JOIN test_metastrings mv4 on mv4.id = m4.value_id
JOIN test_metadata m5 on e.guid = m5.entity_guid
JOIN test_metastrings ms5 on ms5.id = m5.name_id
JOIN test_metastrings mv5 on mv5.id = m5.value_id
JOIN test_metadata m6 on e.guid = m6.entity_guid
JOIN test_metastrings ms6 on ms6.id = m6.name_id
JOIN test_metastrings mv6 on mv6.id = m6.value_id
where ms1.string='expire_date' and mv1.string <= 1272565800 and ms2.string='homecity' and
mv2.string LIKE "%dasf%" and ms3.string='schoolname' and mv3.string LIKE "%asdf%"
and ms4.string='award_amount' and mv4.string <= 123 and ms5.string='no_of_awards' and mv5.string <= 7 and ms6.string='avg_rating' and mv6.string <= 2 and e.type = 'object'
and e.subtype = 5 and e.site_guid = 1 and (obj.title like '%asdf%') OR (obj.description like '%asdf%')
and ((e.access_id = -2 AND e.owner_guid IN (SELECT guid_one FROM test_entity_relationships WHERE relationship='friend' AND guid_two=5)) OR (e.access_id IN (2,1) OR (e.owner_guid = 5) OR (e.access_id = 0 AND e.owner_guid = 5)) and e.enabled='yes')
and ((m1.access_id = -2 AND m1.owner_guid IN (SELECT guid_one FROM test_entity_relationships WHERE relationship='friend' AND guid_two=5)) OR (m1.access_id IN (2,1) OR (m1.owner_guid = 5) OR (m1.access_id = 0 AND m1.owner_guid = 5)) and m1.enabled='yes')
and ((m2.access_id = -2 AND m2.owner_guid IN (SELECT guid_one FROM test_entity_relationships WHERE relationship='friend' AND guid_two=5)) OR (m2.access_id IN (2,1) OR (m2.owner_guid = 5) OR (m2.access_id = 0 AND m2.owner_guid = 5)) and m2.enabled='yes')
and ((m3.access_id = -2 AND m3.owner_guid IN (SELECT guid_one FROM test_entity_relationships WHERE relationship='friend' AND guid_two=5)) OR (m3.access_id IN (2,1) OR (m3.owner_guid = 5) OR (m3.access_id = 0 AND m3.owner_guid = 5)) and m3.enabled='yes')
and ((m4.access_id = -2 AND m4.owner_guid IN (SELECT guid_one FROM test_entity_relationships WHERE relationship='friend' AND guid_two=5)) OR (m4.access_id IN (2,1) OR (m4.owner_guid = 5) OR (m4.access_id = 0 AND m4.owner_guid = 5)) and m4.enabled='yes')
and ((m5.access_id = -2 AND m5.owner_guid IN (SELECT guid_one FROM test_entity_relationships WHERE relationship='friend' AND guid_two=5)) OR (m5.access_id IN (2,1) OR (m5.owner_guid = 5) OR (m5.access_id = 0 AND m5.owner_guid = 5)) and m5.enabled='yes')
and ((m6.access_id = -2 AND m6.owner_guid IN (SELECT guid_one FROM test_entity_relationships WHERE relationship='friend' AND guid_two=5)) OR (m6.access_id IN (2,1) OR (m6.owner_guid = 5) OR (m6.access_id = 0 AND m6.owner_guid = 5)) and m6.enabled='yes')
order by obj.title limit 0, 10
Ceci est la requête que je cours.
Pourriez-vous s'il vous plaît reformater votre SQL afin qu'il ait quelques sauts de ligne, personne ne veut lire une ligne aussi longtemps. –
Merci les gars de me dire, c'est fait. Et merci Lucero, pour le rendre plus lisible –