Est-ce que je fais correctement mon diagramme UML?

Question

Donc, comme mentionné une question de devoirs alors s'il vous plaît allez-y doucement sur moi. fondamentalement, je dois créer un diagramme de cas d'utilisation pour DEUX sous-systèmes. J'ai le jist de cela mais je ne peux pas différencier les deux et je suis un peu confus sur la façon dont ils sont destinés à être liés.

Documentation:

Manufacturing 

Factory Operation 
Each internal factory organises itself into manufacturing modules. Each module has a module leader and a number of technicians. Many internal factories can make the same part. A part may be made up of other parts in which it is called an assembly. Each part has unique part number and a CAD/CAM drawing which is stored electronically. The drawing holds details such as issue number, sizes, materials and sub parts if it is an assembly. The manufacturing system holds a manufacturing route for each part. This details how the part should be made on the CNC machine in terms of manufacturing process (for instance lathe -2 hours, mill -3 hours, grind -1 hour , broach -1 hour, drill -1 hour, hardening - 1 hour, annealing -1 hour , plating - 0.5 hour). A schedule has to be set up by the module leader which states on a weekly basis what CNC machines will be used and who will use them, broken down by the hour. The module leader does this by looking at all the orders received at the beginning of the week and also considering any orders anticipated and the deadlines that have to be met. Changes sometimes need to be made to the schedule to cope with unexpected staff absence, delays or machine break down. The module leader has to forecast the raw materials (e.g. a bar of steel) needed to be bought in the make the parts on a daily basis. Orders for raw materials are to a single specialist supplier. The module leader uses forecasts, bill of materials and part manufacturing specifications to work out what raw materials are needed. Daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly and annual plans are made for raw materials. 

Traceability 
Traceability of components is very important in the aircraft industry. If a part fails  when in use, it is returned to the factory for a diagnosis. If the factory finds a fault in a component it must trace that component back to its original batch and perhaps recall all parts in the same batch. Every bar of metal has a batch number set by the supplier. If a technician makes a part from that bar of metal the bar’s batch number must be maintained for traceability. Parts also have a batch number. This is different to the batch number of the metal bars. The batch number of the metal bars are set by the supplier of the metal. The batch number of the parts are set by the factory. If a number of parts are made in one manufacturing run (which might involve a number of processes) they belong to the same batch. Typically the factory will receive an order for a number of parts and will keep all those parts in the same batch. This is to ensure good traceability from when the part fails in the air right back to the bar of metal that was used to make it. The part batch number is assigned when parts come off the manufacturing process and into store. 

Stores 
Each factory has a store for finished goods. When parts leave manufacturing they must be booked into store. When parts leave store they must be booked out. The store has a number of containers to hold the parts. The store needs to record where the parts are held (i.e. container number). Stores are responsible for despatching parts. 

Désolé, il n'est pas formaté bien, je ne suis pas sûr sur la façon de le faire.

Tâche:

**Manufacturing (Bill of Materials and Manufacturing Method)** 
Bill of Materials (how assemblies are composed), 
Manufacturing for each part (how each part must be manufactured) 

**Manufacturing (Scheduling and Traceability)** 
Machine Shop Scheduling (who is using which machine and when) 
Traceability (Batch numbers, linking to orders, booking into store when complete) 
Factory stores 

cas d'utilisation des diagrammes jusqu'à présent:

enter link description here

enter link description here

Answer 1

Le uml ne dispose pas d'une notion d'exactitude. According to this book, l'uml est dans un mot, "correct", si elle transmet l'idée que vous voulez faire passer.

Voici quelques suggestions que je voudrais mieux transmettre l'idée, d'autres peuvent être en désaccord: Recevoir la pièce défectueuse devrait be an extension of recevoir une partie.
Qui est l'utilisateur du magasin? Qui est le chef de module? Pourriez-vous être plus précis? Les pièces de livres et les pièces d'enregistrement sont-elles suffisamment similaires pour être combinées? Est-ce que la partie de maintien dépend de quelque chose comme dire "Commander la pièce" Est-ce que "définir le numéro de lot" est facultatif? Si tel est le cas, s'étend bien, cependant si la définition du numéro de lot est une étape nécessaire à la création de la pièce, alors faire partie devrait "utiliser" ou "inclure" définir le lot.